01
Teachers do their normal work
Plan MATATAG lessons, build quizzes, grade essays, and give feedback — all in one place, with AI doing the heavy lifting.
AcadiumLab runs your school's full LMS — lesson planning, assessments, and grading — on the DepEd MATATAG curriculum, then automatically surfaces which students are slipping, which lessons aren't landing, and what to do this week. Teachers teach, the platform captures, AI flags, your school acts.
Maria Santos
Grade 8-A · Mathematics
AI insight: Math fell 16 pts in 6 weeks and dropped below passing — flagged for intervention weeks before her report card would show it.
355
the Philippines' PISA 2022 math score — among the lowest of 81 countries. The learning gap is real, and it starts long before report cards show it.
Source: OECD, PISA 2022 Results — Philippines Country Note (2023)0.47%
of Grade 12 learners are rated proficient — down from 30.5% in Grade 3. Gaps compound silently for years when no one is watching the trend.
Source: EDCOM 2, citing DepEd 2024 ELLNA & National Achievement Test (2026)K–10
DepEd MATATAG-aligned by default. Every lesson plan is generated around MATATAG phases — no separate alignment step for teachers.
The problem
The data exists — it's just trapped in gradebooks, paper, and term-end reports. By the time the signal reaches a teacher or principal, the grading period is already gone. And in the Philippines, the gaps it hides are severe.
Proficiency collapses quietly as learners move up — from 30.5% rated proficient in Grade 3 to 0.47% by Grade 12. By the time a report card reveals it, the intervention window has already closed.
Source: EDCOM 2, citing DepEd 2024 ELLNA & National Achievement Test (2026)Each teacher sees their own section. School leaders see nothing until a report is filed. There's no live view of which grade levels, subjects, or students are slipping right now.
Filipino teachers work ~52 hours a week — 17.8 of them on ancillary, non-teaching tasks. Any tool that adds a second reporting workflow simply won't get used.
Source: EDCOM 2 & IDinsight, Teacher Workload Policy Brief (2025)91% of Filipino children can't read a simple text by age 10, and the warning signs are spread across quizzes, essays, and attendance — never assembled into one picture until it's a crisis.
Source: World Bank–UNESCO, Philippines Learning Poverty Brief (2024); 2019 dataThe silent cliff
Share of Filipino learners rated proficient-to-highly-proficient, by grade level.
AcadiumLab gives you the signals while the week is still happening — no second reporting workflow required.
How AcadiumLab works
AcadiumLab works because the intelligence is a by-product of work teachers already do — not a separate data-entry chore. The reports build themselves.
01
Plan MATATAG lessons, build quizzes, grade essays, and give feedback — all in one place, with AI doing the heavy lifting.
02
Every quiz attempt, essay score, and lesson view is logged automatically into weekly snapshots. No extra forms. Nothing new to fill out.
03
Five risk detectors and ranked recommendations turn that raw activity into plain-language insight: who's slipping, which lessons aren't landing, what to do next.
04
Flag at-risk learners, launch interventions, and track the baseline-to-outcome score change. You see whether the support actually worked.
Proof the loop closes
Every intervention tracks a baseline-to-outcome score change — so you see whether the support worked.
Illustrative data.
How it works
The teacher tools save real hours on the biggest non-teaching time sinks — planning, building assessments, and grading. The school-wide intelligence is a by-product of that usage — no separate reporting process required.
What teachers use every day
Pick a competency and get a full lesson plan structured around MATATAG phases — Introduction, Presentation, Practice, Assessment, plus optional Intervention and Reflection. Edit, approve, publish.
Cuts the biggest non-teaching time sinks
Generate quizzes from a lesson or a prompt, or build them by hand. Multiple choice, true/false, matching, essay, fill-in-the-blank, multiple answer, and ordering — all gradable in-platform.
From topic to assigned quiz in minutes
Essays are scored against a rubric for grammar, coherence, structure, and argument quality before the teacher reads them. Review, override if needed, and move on.
Spend Sunday on feedback, not first reads
Tab switches, copy attempts, idle gaps, and 23 other event types are logged during quizzes — surfaced as a per-student summary, not a lockdown lock-out. Data, not accusations.
26 event types, no extra setup
What school leaders gain
Not a single at-risk flag. AcadiumLab runs five detectors — reading comprehension, the rote-vs-mastery transfer gap, early-dropout patterns, missing-work spirals, and silent strugglers (learners who look fine but are quietly sliding) — each with its own detection logic and risk levels.
One operating view across student, classroom, subject, grade-level, and whole-school scopes. At-risk counts, score distributions, and trends — refreshed from real classroom activity every week.
Launch support actions for a student or a whole cohort, then track baseline score → outcome score. Know which interventions worked and which classrooms still need attention.
Each week, plain-language recommendations ranked by priority — the specific competency to reteach, the cohort to check on — instead of a wall of raw numbers.
Captured end to end
From assigned to graded, AcadiumLab records each stage automatically — no spreadsheets, no manual tallies. That captured activity is exactly what the intelligence layer runs on.
Illustrative — sample completion funnel.
Visibility & intelligence
Every chart here is generated automatically from classroom activity — student trends, class health, Bloom's mastery, at-risk counts, and intervention outcomes. No manual reporting.
7 students
At-risk this week
78%
Avg. class score
Fractions
Most-missed competency
+13 pts
Improvement after support
Student vs. class average · weekly snapshots
Weekly support queue
Recovery rate this grading period
9 of 12 flagged learners improved
Score distribution this week
Recall vs. transfer
Most-missed questions (% missed)
School overview · average score by grade
Top school-wide signal
Grade 8 Math (68) is the weakest cell school-wide — the lowest of every subject-by-grade average. Flagged for a department reteach before the next assessment.
All figures shown are illustrative sample data.
Teacher, principal
See who is steady, who is slipping, and which subjects need attention before report-card season.
Used in weekly check-ins and grading-period reviews.
Teacher
Review score distribution, most-missed questions, and at-risk students before planning the next week.
A weekly operating view for the classroom.
Teacher, principal
Identify repeated low scores, declining performance, and inconsistent results while intervention can still help.
The strongest weekly action view for school leaders.
Teacher
See which quiz items broke down, which competencies need reteaching, and whether difficulty matched expectations.
Used after each assessment to improve the next one.
Principal, admin
Compare grade levels, read subject heatmaps, and monitor at-risk counts from one principal-ready view.
The operating view that justifies a school subscription.
Illustrative examples — sample data, not real student records.
Student alert
Recommend an immediate teacher check-in. The early-warning detectors surface this weeks before it would appear on a report card.
Class pattern
Consider remediation before the next assessment. The intelligence layer names the specific competency gap, not just the score.
Transfer gap
Students are memorizing without transferring. Bloom-level tracking separates rote recall from real mastery so you can reteach for understanding.
Intervention success
Outcome tracking shows whether the support a school is already giving is working — so you know where to keep investing.
Every lesson plan AcadiumLab generates is structured around MATATAG phases, and the content is contextualized to DepEd competencies through a curriculum-graph engine — so what you teach is grounded in the official curriculum, not generic AI text.
11
Grade levels
Kinder – Grade 10
14
Learning areas
All DepEd subjects
MATATAG
Phase structure
Built into every lesson
Curriculum-graph alignment
AcadiumLab structures every lesson to MATATAG phases and contextualizes content to DepEd competencies through its curriculum graph — and every competency reference traces back to the official DepEd source text.
Who it's for
The buyer, the daily user, and the learner all have to win for the product to stick. Here's what each part of the school actually gets.
312
Students
18
Active classes
7
At risk
Performance distribution
Illustrative data.
Intervention signals
Maria Santos has scored below 75% on 3 consecutive Math assessments.
Grade 8-A Math scores dropped 12% over the last 3 weeks.
Question 5 in last week's Science quiz was missed by 78% of the class.
Illustrative dashboard — sample data, not real student records.
For principals, owners & administrators
Get a live operating view of sections, subjects, flagged students, and intervention load — without waiting for term-end consolidation or chasing spreadsheets.
For teachers
AcadiumLab cuts the planning, quiz-building, and grading work that usually spills into evenings, so teachers can spend more time on instruction, intervention, and real feedback.
Weekly teacher admin time — typical week vs. with AcadiumLab
Designed to give back hours every week
Filipino teachers work ~52 hrs/week, with 17.8 on non-teaching tasks. AcadiumLab targets the biggest of those — planning, assessment-building, and grading. Projected, based on workflow design.
For students
Students take quizzes in-platform, submit essays for rubric-based AI feedback, and learn alongside an AI study companion — then watch their own progress across every Bloom level without waiting for report-card day.
Essay submission + AI feedback
Grade 8 English • Persuasive writingDraft 2 • 486 words
School uniforms can help students feel part of one community and reduce pressure to buy new clothes every month. When everyone follows a similar dress code, it can be easier to focus on learning instead of comparing brands or styles.
Uniforms may also support safety because teachers and staff can recognize students quickly during field trips, assemblies, or emergencies. 1This is especially helpful in large schools where many classes move through shared spaces at the same time. A clear uniform policy can therefore save time and reduce confusion during busy parts of the day.
Even so, schools should remember that uniforms are not automatically fair just because everyone wears them. Some students feel uncomfortable if the fabric is too warm, the fit is restrictive, or the rules are different for boys and girls. 2Students are more likely to respect the policy when schools explain its purpose and ask for feedback about comfort. That kind of communication can make the rules feel supportive instead of controlling.
For these reasons, I believe school uniforms should still be required, but the policy should be reviewed regularly with students and parents. 3A good uniform policy builds community, improves focus, and still leaves room for student well-being. If schools stay flexible and listen to concerns, uniforms can help students learn without making school feel harder than it needs to be.
AI feedback
“This is especially helpful in large schools...”
Add supporting evidence
This claim makes sense, but it would feel more convincing with one concrete example, such as assemblies, dismissal, or identifying students during trips.
Evidence note: add a short real-world example after this sentence so the paragraph sounds less general.
AI feedback
“Students are more likely to respect the policy...”
Strengthen the transition
This counterpoint is useful, but the paragraph would flow better if you signaled the shift earlier with a phrase like “On the other hand” or “At the same time.”
Coherence note: the idea is strong; it just needs a clearer bridge from benefits to student comfort.
AI feedback
“A good uniform policy builds community...”
Sharpen the conclusion
This is a clear closing idea. To make the ending stronger, echo one earlier reason in more specific language so the conclusion feels tied to your evidence.
Wording note: reuse a phrase such as “reduce pressure to compare outfits” or “improve safety in shared spaces.”
Quiz taking
4 of 5 questions answered
80%Students see completion progress, answer status, and what still needs attention before submitting.
Learning insight
Strengths
Needs work
Why AcadiumLab
Content tools deliver. Logistics tools organize. Chatbots generate. AcadiumLab watches what happens to your learners after the lesson — and tells you what to do about it.
Quipper / DepEd LRMDS
They hand out content, then stop watching. AcadiumLab adds the school-wide signals they never collect: who's slipping, what's not landing, and whether interventions worked.
Google Classroom
No intelligence layer, no risk detection, no MATATAG structure. AcadiumLab adds AI planning and grading, five risk detectors, Bloom mastery tracking, and a school-wide dashboard.
ChatGPT
It generates, but captures nothing. No curriculum structure, no student data, no school view, no guardrails. AcadiumLab is curriculum-aware generation wired into your school's intelligence.
Your school's data, isolated
Every school runs in its own tenant with schema-level data isolation, its own branding, and its own user roles — not a shared pool.
Built for the Data Privacy Act
Student records are encrypted in transit and at rest, with role-based access designed to meet Philippine Data Privacy Act requirements.
No second reporting workflow
The dashboards a principal sees are built automatically from what teachers already do — grading, quizzes, lessons. Nothing extra to fill out.
Procurement-friendly
Official Receipts, VAT-compliant billing, and quotation letters formatted for school procurement. Invoice and bank transfer accepted.
FAQ
Straight answers on DepEd MATATAG alignment, at-risk student detection, AI lesson planning and grading, data privacy, and getting started — for Philippine K–12 schools.
AcadiumLab is an education-intelligence platform — and complete learning management system (LMS) — made for Philippine K–12 schools on the DepEd MATATAG curriculum. Teachers plan lessons, build quizzes, and grade essays in one place; the platform passively captures that activity and turns it into weekly, school-wide signals about which students are slipping and which lessons aren't landing.
Yes. Every lesson plan is generated around the MATATAG phase structure — Introduction, Presentation, Practice, and Assessment, plus optional Intervention and Reflection — and the content is contextualized to DepEd competencies through a curriculum-graph (RAG) engine rather than generic AI text.
How we keep AI lesson plans aligned to MATATAGIt runs five independent detectors over each student's weekly snapshot — reading comprehension, the rote-versus-mastery transfer gap, early-dropout attendance patterns, missing-work spirals, and silent strugglers who still look fine on paper. The detectors surface early evidence that already exists in everyday classwork; the dropout signal is pattern-based, not a future prediction.
How AcadiumLab spots struggling students earlyYes. Pick a competency and AcadiumLab drafts a full MATATAG-structured lesson plan you can edit, approve, and publish. It also generates quizzes across seven question types — multiple choice, true/false, matching, essay, fill-in-the-blank, multiple answer, and ordering — or lets you build them by hand, all gradable in-platform.
Inside the DepEd MATATAG quiz generatorEssays are scored against a rubric for grammar, coherence, structure, and argument quality before the teacher reads them. The teacher reviews, overrides if needed, and spends their time on feedback instead of first reads.
It is built for the teachers, principals, and school administrators running Philippine K–12 schools — public or private — on the DepEd MATATAG curriculum. Teachers get hours back on planning, assessment, and grading; school leaders get a live, school-wide view without anyone filing a separate report.
Most tools stop at delivery: content libraries hand out material, Google Classroom organizes assignments, and chatbots generate one-off outputs. None of them watch what happens to learners after the lesson. AcadiumLab adds an intelligence layer on top of the LMS — five risk detectors, Bloom's-taxonomy mastery tracking, and a school-wide dashboard — and tracks whether interventions actually worked.
Compare AcadiumLab with Quipper and other LMS platformsEach school runs in its own tenant with schema-level data isolation, its own branding, and its own user roles — not a shared pool. Student records are encrypted in transit and at rest, with role-based access designed to meet Philippine Data Privacy Act requirements.
AcadiumLab is sold as a per-school subscription with procurement-friendly billing — Official Receipts, VAT-compliant invoices, and quotation letters formatted for school procurement. There is no public self-service signup yet, so the best next step is to book a platform walkthrough, where we set up a classroom and show you the closed loop end to end on your own data.
Get started
Book a walkthrough and we'll set up a classroom and show you the closed loop end to end — from a MATATAG lesson to a graded quiz to the at-risk signals your leadership team would see on Friday.